CURRENT EDITION
UK guide · Bonus basics
Checking sources behind casino bonus advice
Reliable education distinguishes law, operator terms, mathematical examples and publisher opinion. A source can be useful for one of those purposes without being authoritative for all of them.
- Choose the source for the claim
- Track date and jurisdiction
- Keep uncertainty visible
Choose the source for the claim
Use current regulator material for regulatory requirements, the actual accepted terms for a specific promotion and transparent calculations for arithmetic. A commercial comparison page can show common presentation patterns, but its rankings and testing claims are not facts this library can inherit.
Track date and jurisdiction
Record when a statement was published, last changed and checked. An old official consultation explains a proposal, not necessarily the final rule. A guide written for another country can use familiar words while describing different withdrawal rights or promotional restrictions.
Keep uncertainty visible
If a source is inaccessible or contradictory, say what is unknown. Do not fill a gap with a typical industry rule. A useful explanation can stop at the boundary of the evidence and direct the reader to the specific question that needs an answer.
Keep an evidence hierarchy by question
For a legal requirement, the current operative source takes priority over a commercial summary. For a specific promotion, the accepted terms and account records are more relevant than a general article about typical offers. For an arithmetic statement, the formula should be reproducible from its inputs. For a health or treatment question, use an appropriate health or support organisation rather than a gambling comparison publisher. This is not a single ranking of websites by quality; it is matching evidence to the claim. A source can be authoritative about its own service while having no authority to interpret another regulator powers. Keep that boundary visible and avoid making a citation carry a broader conclusion than the linked page actually supports.
A broken link is not evidence that a claim is false, but it removes a practical verification route. Find the current official page before repeating the claim with confidence or treating an old summary as definitive.
- Check the exact claim, jurisdiction and effective date against the linked material rather than trusting a relevant-sounding title.
- Distinguish the publisher own ranking or testing claim from independently verified facts about a rule or transaction.
- State when an example is invented, a calculation is model-based or a question remains unresolved by the available evidence.
Worked example · hypothetical
Proposal versus operative rule
An imagined article links a consultation proposing several wagering limits. The consultation shows options considered, not which option ultimately applied. The current incentive code and implementation announcement are needed to establish the GB rule in force.
Common questions
Does a citation make every nearby sentence reliable?
No. Check whether the linked source supports the particular claim, date and jurisdiction rather than merely discussing gambling generally.
Are the figures an offer or a promise?
No. They are hypothetical teaching figures. They explain definitions and calculations without recommending an operator, a deposit, a game or a strategy.
Sources & further reading
Read the source alongside the explanation. Rules and published terms can change; check the current official position where you live.
How we research and maintain guides →